From 1990 to 2000, China’s access to the American market was renewed by presidential waiver every twelve months, and the House of Representatives voted each year on whether to withdraw it. The condition attached to that renewal in 1993 names the Tiananmen Square movements in its text. Neither chamber ever withdrew or conditioned the treatment. In 2000 the annual vote was abolished by statute.
On the night of 3 June 1989 the Chinese army entered Beijing and fired on crowds in the streets. At least a thousand civilians were killed. China had applied to rejoin the world trading system three years earlier, on 10 July 1986, and was admitted on 11 December 2001 on terms set out in a protocol with expiry dates written into it.
Between those dates ran an annual American vote. Under the Trade Act of 1974, China’s most-favoured-nation treatment in the United States ran on a twelve-month presidential waiver that Congress could disapprove. From 1990 the House of Representatives voted on that disapproval every year. In 1993 the renewal was made conditional by executive order, and the order names the Tiananmen Square movements in its text. In 2000 the annual vote was abolished by statute.
On the night of 3 June 1989 the Chinese army moved into Beijing from the west and fired on the crowds that had built barricades to stop it. The worst of it was at Muxidi, about four kilometres west of Tiananmen Square. Amnesty International, which investigated for a year and published in 1990, records hundreds killed or wounded in that area alone and people shot inside the apartment blocks that line the road; its finding on the total is at least a thousand civilians, against an official Chinese figure of about two hundred.
The ammunition is in the record three times, written down by three kinds of witness.
4 June 1989, one in the morning. The United Press International correspondent David R. Schweisberg files from the Monument to the People’s Heroes. His dispatch carries a young Chinese photographer with a two-inch gash in his abdomen, holding up a camera lens shattered by a bullet: “The lens was on his belt in a bag and took most of the force of the steel-jacketed round.”
5 June 1989. Sir Alan Donald, Britain’s ambassador in Beijing, files a telegram to London about twenty-four hours after the shooting. Four words of it read: “27 Army were using dum-dum bullets.” They sit beside “27 Army ordered to spare no-one and shot wounded SMR soldiers” and four wounded girl students who “begged for their lives but were bayoneted.”
3 June 2014. Group Captain Peter Everett, Australia’s military attaché in Beijing in 1989, holds one up to a television camera for the ABC’s Foreign Correspondent. He collected seventy-two of them out of the flats of embassy staff near Chang’an Avenue, the avenue the troops came down. He calls them dumdum bullets: “That’s the core — solid steel. The core is surrounded by lead and then surrounded again by a thin copper sheath which peels apart like a banana when it hits something.”
Twenty-five years separate the first account from the last. The detail was carried the whole way.
What follows is the American trade record attached to that week, and the dates on it.
The American measures taken after 3 June 1989, and what became of each.
Six and a half months separate the embargo of 5 June 1989 from the waivers of 19 December. Within that period the same administration waived it for aircraft navigation systems, fighter avionics, Export-Import Bank financing and satellite launches, and sent two missions to Beijing. The trade relationship itself was not suspended at any point.
Under the Trade Act of 1974, a non-market economy could only hold most-favoured-nation treatment in the American market through a presidential waiver that had to be renewed every twelve months, and Congress could vote the renewal down. For China, from 1990, that is exactly what happened: once a year, in public, the House of Representatives debated whether to take away the country’s access to the largest consumer market on earth, and recorded every member’s name on the result.
Each year’s vote is set out below against that year’s goods imports from China. Move the year to read both.
Pick a year
The highest count is 1992, at 258 to 135. That year the House also passed conditions twice; both bills were vetoed, the House overrode both vetoes, and the Senate sustained both. The count falls to 105 in 1993 and 75 in 1994, and does not return above 173 in any later year. Across the same eleven years, goods imports from China rose from $15.2bn to $100.0bn.
In no year did both chambers withdraw or condition the treatment. On 24 May 2000 the House voted 237 to 197 to make it permanent; the Senate agreed 83 to 15 on 19 September; it was signed on 10 October 2000. The 197 votes against are more than were cast for withdrawal in any year after 1992.
The renewal of 1994 was made conditional by executive order the year before. The order names the event in the text of the condition.
§1(a) In making this recommendation the Secretary shall not recommend extension unless he determines that: extension will substantially promote the freedom of emigration objectives of section 402 of the Act; and China is complying with the 1992 bilateral agreement between the United States and China concerning prison labor.
§1(b) In making this recommendation the Secretary shall also determine whether China has made overall, significant progress with respect to the following: taking steps to begin adhering to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; releasing and providing an acceptable accounting for Chinese citizens imprisoned or detained for the non-violent expression of their political and religious beliefs, including such expression of beliefs in connection with the Democracy Wall and Tiananmen Square movements; ensuring humane treatment of prisoners…; protecting Tibet’s distinctive religious and cultural heritage; and permitting international radio and television broadcasts into China.
The order required the Secretary of State to report before 3 June 1994, and the President to decide on the twelve months beginning 3 July 1994. The report was delivered and the decision announced on 26 May 1994, three hundred and sixty-three days after the order was signed.
“He has reached a conclusion with which I agree, that the Chinese did not achieve overall significant progress in all the areas outlined in the Executive order relating to human rights…”
“I have decided that the United States should renew most-favored-nation trading status toward China… I am moving, therefore, to delink human rights from the annual extension of most-favored-nation trading status for China. That linkage has been constructive during the past year. But I believe… that we have reached the end of the usefulness of that policy.”
The conditions were found unmet, the renewal was granted, and the linkage was ended the same afternoon. In the same statement the President extended the Tiananmen sanctions and added a ban on importing Chinese guns and ammunition. Six years later the annual vote itself was abolished.
China applied to resume its place in the trading system on 10 July 1986, three years before Tiananmen, and was admitted on 11 December 2001. The terms are a published protocol, and two of its clauses carry expiry dates.
Those two clauses are the measurable price of admission: twelve years during which other members could apply a safeguard against Chinese goods alone, and fifteen during which they could price those goods off a third country’s costs in dumping cases. In 2001, the year of accession, China sold the United States $102bn of goods.
The lever on China’s terms of entry was annual, numbered and recorded. It carried a condition naming the Tiananmen Square movements from 28 May 1993 to 26 May 1994. It was put to the House of Representatives in each of eleven years and was never carried into law, and on 10 October 2000 it was abolished.
Volume I sets out the monetary arrangement that China’s integration served. The votes above are how that integration was carried.
Grouped by the section each one supports.
What happened in Beijing on 3–4 June 1989
The American measures of June to December 1989
Every roll call in the rail, and the trade it was attached to
Executive Order 12850 and the decision of 26 May 1994
China’s application, the bilateral agreement and the accession terms
Visual direction after the oceanographic films of Jacques-Yves Cousteau and the crew of the R.V. Calypso, 1943–1996. The saucer is the SP-350 “Denise”. No affiliation; the debt is the point.