Investigative Economics  ·  theaxes.fyi ↗
Volume VIII · A hearing on a research grant

Prolonged
Repetition of
Verbal Signals.

That is the title of a Canadian federal health grant — project 604-5-432, fifty-seven thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars, 1961 to 1964. The CIA paid $59,467.54 for the Montreal experiments. Canada paid $495,494.41. The class action now in discovery is against Canada, McGill and the Royal Victoria Hospital; the CIA is immune.

Subject1948 – 1964
MechanismA grant in its own name; a release at the end
Court file500-06-000972-196
Read time15 minutes
Volume VIII A report, not an adjudication: there is no claim in the dock here, because the documents do the work unassisted. It follows Volume VII directly — the same country, the same decades, and the same mechanism one turn further on. There, a board signed the consent. Here, a department signed the cheque.

The sentence everybody knows is that the CIA ran mind-control experiments on Canadians. It is true, and it is the smaller half of the story. The larger half is a line of federal grants, made in the open, under a programme whose stated purpose was strengthening health services in Canada.

Between 1948 and 1964, at the Allan Memorial Institute of the Royal Victoria Hospital, affiliated with McGill University, Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron practised what he called depatterning and psychic driving: intensive electroconvulsive therapy at many times the ordinary dose, drug-induced sleep for weeks, sensory isolation, and tape loops played to patients for hours or days. Patients had arrived for depression, anxiety, post-partum illness. What the treatment aimed at — in the Superior Court’s summary — was “erasing a patient’s thoughts whereby patients were immobilized, rendered intellectually helpless and prevented from using their defences.”

On 31 July 2025 the Superior Court of Quebec authorised a class action on behalf of everyone this was done to, and their families and successors, against the Government of Canada, the Royal Victoria Hospital and McGill University. The United States had already been dismissed on state immunity, and in 2024 the Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear the appeal of that dismissal. The Royal Victoria Hospital’s bid for leave to appeal the authorisation was refused on 13 November 2025. Proceedings were instituted on 19 January 2026 and the file is in discovery now.

So the foreign funder cannot be sued, and the domestic ones can. That happens to be the correct order, and not for the reason the folklore gives.

i. The money

Eight dollars from Ottawa for every one from Langley.

The CIA’s contribution ran through a front, the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology, as Subproject 68: three grants between 18 March 1957 and 30 June 1960, totalling $59,467.54. It is the part everyone can name.

The Department of National Health and Welfare’s contribution is set out in the authorisation judgment as a table. Nine projects, $495,494.41, made under the Mental Health Grant — federally funded, provincially administered, and, in the Court’s words, “for the express purpose of strengthening health services in Canada.”

The instrument · who paid for it Authorisation judgment, 500-06-000972-196, paras. 87–96
CIA · Subproject 68, via the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology · 1957–1960
$59,467.54
Canada · Department of National Health and Welfare, Mental Health Grant · 1950–1965
$495,494.41

The nine federal projects, as listed by the Court. Two were identified in the government’s own review as overlapping the work Cameron did with CIA money — switch the filter and the table shows only those.

ProjectTitle, as grantedAmount · years
604-5-11The Effect of Senescence on Resistance to Stress$195,388.00 · 1950–57
604-5-13Research Studies on E.E.G. and Electrophysiology$60,353.33 · 1950–57
604-5-14Support for a Behavioral Laboratory$17,875.00 · 1950–54
604-5-43Study of the Personal and Social Aspects of Retirement and Retirement Adjustment$24,450.00 · 1956–58
604-5-74Study of Ultraconceptual Communication$26,228.08 · 1959–61
604-5-76A Study of the Effects of Nucleic Acid Upon Memory Impairment in the Aged$18,000.00 · 1959–63
604-5-104Comparative Studies of Adrenal Cortical Function in Aged Persons with Acute Confusional States or Senile Psychosis$51,860.00 · 1963–65
604-5-108Psychiatric Research in Clinical Criminology: criminal behaviour as a symptom; emotional growth and criminality; the family as a transmitter of criminal values$43,590.00 · 1963–65
604-5-432A Study of Factors which Promote or Retard Personality Change in Individuals Exposed to Prolonged Repetition of Verbal Signals$57,750.00 · 1961–64
$495,494.41Federal total, nine projects
8.3×Canada’s share against the CIA’s
16Years of continuous funding

Read the last row again. Prolonged repetition of verbal signals is psychic driving — the tape loop, played to a patient for hours. It is not a euphemism invented afterwards by a critic. It is the title the project was funded under, by a department of the Government of Canada, for fifty-seven thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars, for three years.

ii. The method, in the grant file

What the laboratory said it would do.

Project 604-5-14, “Support for a Behavioral Laboratory,” ran from 1950 to 1954 on federal money. The review commissioned by the government itself describes the experiments it planned, and the Court reproduces the description:

One was to test memory and learning impairment due to individual and cumulative electric shock. Another was to film patients against a checkered backdrop before and after ECT treatment, to see if any differences in physical movements could be detected. A third was to study the effects of sensory isolation. A fourth was to investigate psychic driving techniques in various situations: while the patient was under hypnosis, in continuous sleep, and when the patient’s resistance was lowered using the isolation techniques of Dr. Hebb.

Four experiments. Memory impairment by cumulative electric shock; a film record of what the shocks did to how a person moved; sensory isolation; and psychic driving applied to patients under hypnosis, in drug-induced sleep, and with their resistance deliberately lowered. This is a funded research plan, held in a federal file, six years before the CIA’s first cheque.

The same government review concluded that the Department of National Health and Welfare “conducted itself in a prudent and professional manner.” Its author allowed only that some reviewers “may have been somewhat reluctant to express doubts, if indeed they had any, about the medical or scientific basis for the procedures under review,” given Cameron’s standing.

Who wrote the review. The document is known as the Cooper Report. The lawyer who represented the victims against the CIA wrote that “the result was neither independent nor a study, but was instead a several hundred page brief, which concluded not only that Canada was blameless, but that the CIA involvement with Cameron was ‘a red herring’” — and that although it was called the Cooper Report, “it had, in fact, been compiled and written by Canadian Justice Department lawyers.” That criticism is reproduced in the authorisation judgment. It is an allegation, not a finding; the Court has not tried it.
iii. The remedy

One hundred thousand dollars, and a signature.

In 1992 Canada made payments to some of the patients under an instrument with a name that says what it is: the Order Respecting Ex Gratia Payments to Persons Depatterned at the Allan Memorial Institute Between 1950 and 1965. It was launched, in the Court’s summary, “without prejudice and for compassionate and humanitarian reasons” — which is to say without an admission that anything was owed.

To receive it you had to satisfy three conditions. You had to be a permanent resident of Canada and alive at the time of the payment. You had to sign a waiver protecting Her Majesty in right of Canada and the Royal Victoria Hospital against court action. And you had to withdraw any action you had already brought.

The release ran against “Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada and Her Ministers of Justice, National Defence and Health and Welfare, their officers, servants and employees.” National Defence is in that list. Nobody put it there by accident.

Approximately 77 patients were indemnified. Hundreds were refused — in the pleading’s words, because they “had not been de-patterned enough to warrant compensation.” A judge, on a later revision, would have allowed a further 250. The Attorney General of Canada now argues that class members who signed the release cannot be in the class at all; the Court has held it premature to decide that, which means the waivers signed in 1992 are live legal argument in 2026.

The test the state applied. Eligibility turned on how completely a person had been erased, assessed from records held by the institution that erased them, decades later, and only for those still alive to claim. A programme whose method was the destruction of memory produced a remedy that required documentary proof of the damage.
iv. The record

Dates, in order.

Statutes, orders, reported decisions and the authorisation judgment in court file 500-06-000972-196.

1948Public money, in its own name
1948
Cameron’s work at the Allan Memorial Institute begins; the class period opens.
AMI / McGill
1950–1957
The first federal grants under the Mental Health Grant, including “Support for a Behavioral Laboratory” — the project whose plan names cumulative electric shock, sensory isolation and psychic driving.
Health and Welfare
18 Mar 1957
First of three CIA grants through the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology, Subproject 68. The last runs to 30 June 1960. Total, $59,467.54.
MKULTRA
1961–1964
Project 604-5-432, “Prolonged Repetition of Verbal Signals,” $57,750 — federal money, after the CIA money has stopped.
Health and Welfare
1977Disclosure, and what followed it
1977
MKULTRA surfaces in United States Senate hearings; the Montreal subproject is identified.
US Senate
1988
Orlikow v. United States: nine former patients settle with the CIA.
682 F. Supp. 77
1992
The ex gratia Order. Alive, waiver, withdrawal. About 77 paid at $100,000; hundreds refused as not depatterned enough; a further 250 allowed on revision.
Canada
2019Reopened
2019
Application for authorisation filed in the Superior Court of Quebec.
500-06-000972-196
2023–2024
The United States is dismissed on state immunity; the Court of Appeal upholds it; the Supreme Court of Canada declines leave.
Que. C.A. / SCC
31 Jul 2025
Authorisation granted by Poulin J. Class: everyone depatterned at the AMI between 1948 and 1964 by Cameron’s methods, with successors, family and dependants. Defendants: Canada, the Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill.
Que. Sup. Ct.
13 Nov 2025
The Royal Victoria Hospital is refused leave to appeal the authorisation.
Que. C.A.
19 Jan 2026
Application to institute proceedings filed. Notice to class members, then discovery: documents, and examinations.
Que. Sup. Ct.

The shape of that list is the finding. The foreign agency paid for three years and is beyond the reach of the court. The Canadian department paid for sixteen, in nine grants, under its own programme, and is a defendant. In between, the state reviewed itself, cleared itself, and bought releases from the survivors it agreed to pay — having first ranked them by how much of them was left.

Everyone remembers that the CIA paid.

Ottawa paid eight times more, and filed it under health services.

The file is open again, and this time the defendant is domestic.

v. Sources

Where to check every line above.

  1. Tanny and Ponting v. Attorney General of Canada, Royal Victoria Hospital and McGill University, Superior Court of Quebec (Class Actions), file 500-06-000972-196 — judgment granting authorisation, 31 July 2025, Poulin J. The funding table is at paragraph 88; the Behavioral Laboratory experiment plan at paragraph 96; the Cooper Report criticism at paragraph 103; the ex gratia Order, its conditions and the release at paragraphs 113–117.
  2. Procedural history, class definition and current stage: Consumer Law Group, case page — leave to appeal refused 13 November 2025; application to institute proceedings filed 19 January 2026.
  3. Authorisation reported: CBC News and The Globe and Mail, 31 July 2025.
  4. The United States dismissed on state immunity, upheld on appeal, leave refused: CBC News on the Court of Appeal, and CBC News on the Supreme Court of Canada declining to hear it.
  5. Orlikow v. United States, 682 F. Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988) — the settlement with the CIA, cited in the authorisation judgment at note 88.
  6. Background on Cameron, depatterning and the Montreal experiments: The Canadian Encyclopedia.
  7. The consent mechanism this volume follows from, and the Alberta statute that ran on it: Volume VII, Signed by the Board.

Visual direction after the oceanographic films of Jacques-Yves Cousteau and the crew of the R.V. Calypso, 1943–1996. The saucer is the SP-350 “Denise”. No affiliation; the debt is the point.